This is what I'm seeing when clicking on the filter. On the #1 pet supplies category refill up to goal it showed Funded at the begining of the month with a $50 dollars budgeted. Spent some it this month and may spend more but at this time it doesn't seem overbudgeted... The #2 term life category save by date...the bill was paid in Apr so goal should be starting over this month and I only budgeted what the save by date goal asked for adding nothing extra. The #3 Murano goal save by date was Acheived last month and did not ask for funds this month as expected. Why it's considered overbudgetd eludes me. I shouldn't have used the term alarm...Overbudgeted actually sounds like a good thing to me actually indicating that I have put some funds that are being wasted in one category that could be put to better use use in another category. Could just be the way I think about this stuff but I would not pull funds from any of these categories unless I accepted that some figures will change with them in coming months. I appreciate you're taking the time to help me to understand this system as I really love the app, but I guess I don't understand how these categories are considered overbudget.
Pet Supplies and Term Life are both real bugs that I've fixed. They should drop off the Overbudgeted filter now. Murano's the only one that's actually correct, just badly worded. You've got $86.05 in there against an $85 target, that $1.05 really is removable (you could move it to RTA right now and Murano would still hit $85 by September). The goal doesn't "reset" until either the due date passes or you spend, so it'll keep flagging that extra $1.05 until one of those happens.
Glad the bug is squashed and good catch on the one that’s correct. I should have picked up on that! Thanks again for quick fix…
Good question. The Overbudgeted filter is showing categories where ZeroSum thinks you can move money out and the goal would still remain funded / on track. For Refill up to, this is expected. If you have a goal to refill up to £200, and the month starts with £200, the goal is funded for that month. If you then spend from it during the month, ZeroSum should not start asking for more immediately, because that spending is the whole point of having the money there. Next month, it will ask you to refill back up to £200 again. For Save by date, ZeroSum spreads the target over the remaining months. So if you want £1,000 in 10 months, it may ask for £100 this month. If you budget £150, you’re still on track, but £50 is technically removable because the goal would still be happy with £100. That’s why it can appear as Overbudgeted. Same idea when the goal is Achieved. If you need £1,000 by December and you have £1,100 in December, ZeroSum can show £100 as overbudgeted because you could move that £100 out and still have the £1,000 you needed. Also, spending in the due month does not reopen the goal. If you had the £1,000 by December and then spent from it in December, the goal stays achieved because you had the money when you needed it. If the goal repeats yearly, January starts the next cycle using whatever is left over, and ZeroSum spreads the remaining amount toward the next December target. So it’s not really an alarm. It’s more like: "this money can be moved elsewhere without breaking the goal." I may tweak the wording/help copy because I can see how “Overbudgeted” sounds scarier than intended.